A Magyar Tudomanyos Akadémia must demonstrably justify the validity of their methodology applied to classify languages and in the first place how they managed to cook up a PROTO URALIC language and squeeze Hungarian into that figment of their mindset.
If Hungarian as an agglutinative language cannot be related to Finnish especially based on lexical correspondences, sadly Hungarian cannot be more related to the Turkic languages either.
So might as well, we have to keep flagging the Sumerian, Etruscan, and even the pharaonic language links with Hungarian.
- I present here below a comprehensive opportunity for any sensible Hungarian to disagree with me but they have to show solid evidence to the contrary.
-
- proto-uralic lexicon thesis
- No Language relative
- CLASSIFICATION OF LANGUAGES
- ....................
- Some Turkic sources (http://www.turkicworld.org/ )
- are here for you to peruse.
- They are in MS Doc format.
- ...................
- 461 TURKIC WORD RELATEDNESS
- TURKIC LANGUAGES
- home-TURKIC HISTORY
- ................
- HUNS TIMELINE
- AVARS DATELINE
- .....................
- BESENYO TIMELINE
- ALANS DATELINE
- BULGAR TIMELINE
- CULTURE KURGAN 0
- CULTURE KURGAN
- CULTURE KURGAN2
- CULTURE KURGAN3
- CULTURE KURGAN4
- DATELINES
- EPHTALITE DATELINE
- KARLUK TIMELINE
- KAZAR DATELINE
- KIMAK DATELINE
- KIPCSAK DATELINE
- KYRGYZ DATELINE
- OGUZnOGUR
- SABIR DATELINE
- SZKITA LANGUAGE
- TOTH-AGLUTINATIVE STRUCTURES